DBT Screening Valuable in Community Practice

Michael Kravets • October 12, 2021



Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Valuable in Community Practice



Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) detected almost twice as many cancers as digital mammography and roughly 17% more invasive cancers, in community practice settings. In addition, the mean age at detection for DBT was lower than DM by 3 years, according to a study published September 15, 2021, in the American Journal of Roentgenology.

“A total of 310 cancers were detected in 47,096 screening DBT examinations and 83,200 screening DM examinations. Cancer detection rate was higher (p<.001) for DBT (3.4 per 1000 women) than DM (1.8 per 1000 women). [Positive predictive value] PPV1 was higher (p<.001) for DBT [3.5% (161/4641)] than DM [2.1% (149/7116)]. Age was lower (p=.02) for patients with screen-detected cancer by DBT (mean, 61 years; range, 40-87 years) than DM (mean, 64 years; range, 37-88 years). A greater percentage of DBT-detected than DM-detected cancers were invasive [85.1% (137/161) vs 72.5% (108/149), respectively; p=.006], grade 1 when invasive [27.9% (38/136) vs 17.8% (19/107), respectively; p=.04], and node negative [92.2% (71/77) vs 78.4% (58/74), respectively; p=.02]. Cancers detected by DBT and DM were not significantly different in histologic subtype, molecular subtype, or mean size (all p>.05),” found the team, led by Dr. Helena Regen-Tuero from Brown University.

The objective of the study was “[t]o compare DBT and DM in terms of screening performance and tumor characteristics of screen-detected cancers, in a community practice setting,” wrote the authors. They concluded, “[t]he findings support the generalizability of insights into DBT-based screening, which previously have been investigated primarily in academic settings.”

Sources:

Regen-Tuero, Helaina C. and Ram, Shruthi and Gass, Jennifer S. and Lourenco, Ana P. Community-Based Breast Cancer Screening Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography: Comparison of Screening Performance and Tumor Characteristics. American Journal of Roentgenology. Doi: 10.2214/AJR.21.26384 Published online September 15, 2021. Accessed September 27, 2021, at https://www.ajronline.org/doi/10.2214/AJR.21.26384

Allegretto, Amerigo. DBT screening shows value in community practice settings. AuntMinnie.com September 17, 2021. Accessed September 27, 2021, at https://www.auntminnie.com/index.aspx?sec=sup&sub=wom&pag=dis&ItemID=133506

digital breast tomosynthesis

Reducing Radiation Dose
By Laura Marr March 6, 2026
Can better design lower radiation? Explore the critical link between C-arm ergonomics and dose reduction, and why streamlining surgical workflows is the most effective way to protect patients and staff.
New vs Refurbished C-Arms: What’s Right for Your Imaging Strategy
By Laura Marr February 27, 2026
New vs. refurbished C-arms: which is the right move for your facility? Compare the cutting-edge technology of new systems against the high-ROI value of certified refurbished units to optimize your 2026 imaging strategy.
C-Arm Imaging Decisions
By Laura Marr February 20, 2026
Explore why radiation management is now a top priority in C-arm selection. Learn how clinical safety standards, dose-reduction technology, and long-term practitioner health are reshaping imaging decisions.